Law firm marketing positions in England and Wales: four roles

Last updated: 5 August 2026

Which marketing roles exist inside an English or Welsh firm?

Four, and they are not interchangeable. Two are found in any professional services business, one is particular to this profession, and one is particular to this jurisdiction.

The fourth row is the one this page exists for. In the US and Australian trees there is no publication rule and therefore no equivalent responsibility. Here there is a rule with a date on it, and rules with dates attach to people.

A damaging admission before anything else: we hold no salary data. Not for any of these roles, in any city, at any firm size. Every figure this programme cites comes from measured search data or from 40 supplier pages read in full, and pay was not among them. If you came for a band, this page does not have one and will not invent one.

Which role owns what the firm publishes about price?

In most firms, nobody, by default. That is the finding worth acting on.

The work sits between three functions and belongs cleanly to none of them. Marketing owns the website but not the numbers. Finance owns the numbers but not the website. The COLP owns the risk but not the keyboard. The result is a page that was correct on the day it was published and has not been looked at since.

What the role actually involves, when somebody does hold it:

1. Getting the figures out of the matter data and into a form that can be published.
2. Getting them agreed by whoever can commit the firm to them.
3. Keeping them current when fees move, which is the part that fails.
4. Knowing which of the firm's work types the rules cover, which is a question for the firm and its own advisers rather than for a supplier.

Point four is where an outside consultancy earns its money. tealcompliance.com is an example of the kind of firm engaged for exactly that question; it is one of only 12 of the 40 suppliers we read on 3 August 2026 that published a price at all.

What happens when nobody owns it?

The pages go stale, and staleness is visible to the reader in a way an absence is not.

A missing fee page reads as a firm that has not got round to it. A fee page carrying last year's figures reads as a firm that does not check its own published information, which is a worse impression to leave with somebody deciding whether to instruct you. That is the practical case for a named owner rather than a shared one.

There is a demand argument underneath it as well. In Manchester, 1,760 people a month search for a conveyancing solicitor and Google charges around £18.57 for one of those clicks, measured 3 August 2026. A hundred of those clicks is £1,857 — arithmetic on the two figures, not a forecast — landing on pages that either answer the price question or do not.

How does this sit alongside the COLP?

Adjacent, not underneath. The distinction matters at sign-off.

The COLP carries the firm's regulatory responsibility. A marketing role, however senior, cannot absorb that and should not be described as if it does. What a well-defined position does is take the drafting, the maintenance and the version history off the COLP's desk, and bring a finished thing to be approved rather than a problem to be solved.

We never say a firm is made compliant by anything we build. Only the firm and its COLP can reach that judgement. We build the pages the rules ask for and hand them over with the sourcing attached.

What does a directories and awards role actually do?

Submissions, on an annual cycle, for an audience that is not the public.

This is the role most often mistaken for marketing in the search sense. A ranked entry on legal500.com is read by other solicitors, by in-house counsel building a panel, and by recruiters. It is worth having for those reasons. It does not bring somebody who has just been injured or is buying a house to the firm's website, and a firm that treats its directory work as its digital marketing has covered one audience twice and the other not at all.

legal500.com published no price on the page we read on 3 August 2026, which is normal for a directory and is worth knowing before the submission season starts.

What can an outside supplier not take off a firm's hands?

Four things, and they are the four that decide whether the rest works.

• The numbers. Fee data comes out of the firm's own systems. A supplier who offers to write your price pages without asking for your figures is writing fiction.
• The sign-off. Somebody inside the firm has to be able to commit it to a published figure.
• The judgement about scope. Which work types are covered is the firm's question, with its own advisers.
• The relationships. Panel applications and referral sources are held by people, not by suppliers.

Everything else is buyable. thelegalmarketingcompany.com and lexisnexis.co.uk sit on different sides of that line — one is an outsourced marketing function, the other a knowledge provider a firm subscribes to — and the useful exercise before hiring anybody is to work out which of the four immovable items your current shortage actually is.

Where is another supplier the better choice?

Three cases, said plainly.

• A firm that wants an outsourced marketing department, running events, print and brand alongside the website, should talk to thelegalmarketingcompany.com or a comparable full-service agency. That is a broader remit than ours and we do not pretend otherwise.
• A firm whose real question is about its own obligations should engage a consultancy such as tealcompliance.com rather than a marketing supplier.
• A firm that needs the underlying material rather than a website should look at a knowledge provider such as lexisnexis.co.uk, which is one of the 12 that published a price.

We build pages and we do not manage ad spend, run events, or place directory submissions.

What should you check before shortlisting a marketing supplier?

We read 40 legal-marketing suppliers in full in August 2026 — including several on this page. 12 published a price. 1 offered work with no minimum term.

The free report gives you the full count, named, so you can repeat it rather than take ours. It also shows how many people search for your practice areas in your town, and what those clicks cost to buy at Google's own prices.

Get the report — five questions, about two minutes →

No call required. Our own prices are on that page.

Which pages should I read next on price transparency?

On the duty the fourth role exists to discharge: what the SRA transparency rules actually require on a website, and which of your services the price rules cover, and what has to appear on each page.

On what else belongs on those pages: complaints information, the Legal Ombudsman and the SRA digital badge: what belongs where, and price transparency pages: what good looks like, with the rule quoted.

On the wider question of hiring versus retaining: lawyer firm marketing.

Frequently asked questions