Law firm SEO services in Australia: the scope, line by line

A law firm SEO service in Australia is a defined list of work, not a retainer for effort. Ours is 2 fixed scopes: A$1,900 for a sprint on pages that already exist, A$4,200 for a build that adds the ones that do not. What sits outside both is listed further down this page.

Last updated: 5 August 2026

What is actually included in an SEO service for a law firm?

A named list of deliverables, with a number written against each one.

Most arguments between a firm and a search supplier are not arguments about quality. They are arguments about whether something was ever inside the scope, and they happen because the scope was described as a discipline rather than as a list. We sell two fixed scopes and publish both prices, so the disagreement has somewhere to be settled before it starts.

The counting matters more than the labels. A sprint producing eleven rewritten pages and a sprint producing four are both honestly described as an answer-first rewrite, and only one of them is worth A$1,900. Ask for the number before signing — of us, and of everyone else on the list.

What sits outside both scopes?

Six things, and the exclusion list is longer than the inclusion list on purpose.

• Advertising, and the running of it. We do not manage ad spend. Australian clicks are cheap enough that paid search is frequently the correct answer, and it is never this one.
• Intake. What happens between an enquiry arriving and somebody ringing back sits inside the firm, and it decides whether the rest was worth buying.
• The facts of the matters. A page about a property settlement is only worth reading if a fee earner said what actually happens. That time belongs to the firm, it is the item most often underestimated at signing, and nobody outside can substitute for it.
• Brand identity and photography. We put pages inside a look that already exists. Creating the look is a separate purchase from a different kind of supplier.
• Hosting, domains and practice-management integrations. We work with whatever is already in place and say so while quoting rather than afterwards.
• Sign-off. Whether a page may say a particular thing about the firm's work is a judgement for the firm and its own advisers. We give no advice about professional obligations, and Australia has no rule requiring a firm to publish anything.

The admission that costs us enquiries: the A$1,900 sprint on its own will not move a competitive search. It makes existing pages quotable, and fixes what is broken underneath them. Where a firm has almost nothing written, there is nothing for a sprint to rewrite and it is the wrong purchase.

When does a firm usually find out where the boundary sits?

At the invoice, which is the worst available moment and an entirely avoidable one.

Four points where the edge surfaces, in the order they normally arrive:

Month two, when the facts are requested. Somebody has to describe how this firm runs a matter. If nobody was told at signing that this would take a fee earner an hour a fortnight, the request reads as the supplier failing to do its job.

Month three, when a practice area is added. The scope named the areas. A new one is new pages, and pretending otherwise means the original count quietly shrinks.

Month five, when somebody asks who is running the advertising. Nobody is. It was never in either scope, and the firm has spent five months assuming the opposite.

Month seven, when the firm wants everything moved. Ownership of the site, the content, the measurement property and the domain should be settled in the first document, not the last one.

15 of the 62 questions buyers ask across these searches are price questions, measured 3 August 2026, and it is the largest single category. Most suppliers do not answer it on the page where it is asked, so the answer arrives later, as an invoice.

What do Australian suppliers put in writing before a firm signs?

Less than a firm expects, and one of these three published a figure at all.

Read 3 August 2026, as part of 40 legal-marketing suppliers read in full that day. Two limits on that table before anyone leans on it: it records whether a figure appeared, not what the figure was, because the numbers our tooling collected mixed genuine fees with case values and fragments, and a wrong figure against a named business is not a mistake worth making. It is also one day. A supplier who published a price last month still reads as no here until we read them again.

Across the whole 40: twelve published a price at all, five of those twelve showed only a range rather than a figure, eight claimed a guarantee of some kind, and one offered work with no minimum term.

How should a firm read a scope document it did not write?

By counting nouns, and by working out what the same scope buys in its own city.

A scope that can be counted can be compared. Ask how many pages, on what subjects, written by whom, and whether that person is on the call. Ask what happens to a page after it is published, and ask what the supplier will not do. A fee attached to that list divides into something. A fee attached to a description of a process divides into nothing, and cannot be set beside a rival fee attached to a different description.

Then check what the same scope is worth where the firm is. In Perth, family law runs at 4,190 searches a month at around A$12.57 a click, while conveyancing runs at 790 searches a month at around A$30.18, both measured 3 August 2026. A hundred clicks is roughly A$1,257 in one and roughly A$3,018 in the other — arithmetic on the two measured figures, not a forecast and not a prediction of what any page will earn. The point is that an identical scope, sold at an identical price, is a different proposition in the two practice areas, and no supplier's rate card will tell a firm that.

Ours, so this page is not asking for something it will not do: A$1,900 for the sprint, A$4,200 for the build. Fixed, published, no minimum term. We never charge per enquiry or per matter, and we do not promise a position or a number of enquiries, because nobody controls either.

Which line items should a firm refuse to pay for?

Five, all of which are cheap to produce and easy to invoice.

• Location pages by the dozen. Thirty suburb pages for a firm with one office is volume sold as coverage. The searches those pages target are largely the same search.
• Word count as a deliverable. Four thousand words a month describes an amount of typing, not a subject anybody was searching for.
• A promised position. Eight of the 40 suppliers read on 3 August 2026 claimed a guarantee of some kind, and nobody controls Google's results.
• Payment tied to enquiries or matters. We never price that way. It introduces an incentive nobody in a law firm wants, and it is worth asking every supplier on a shortlist where they stand on it.
• Reporting as a separate charge. Being told what happened to work already paid for is part of the work.

Before you shortlist anyone

We read 40 legal-marketing suppliers in full in August 2026 — including several on this page. Twelve published a price. One offered work with no minimum term.

The free report gives you the full count, named, so you can repeat it rather than take ours. It also shows how many people search for your practice areas in your town, and what those clicks cost to buy at Google's own prices.

Get the report — five questions, about two minutes →

No call required. Our own prices are on that page.

Where should I read next?

If the question is who does the work rather than what the work is: marketing agency for law firm covers the same-city problem, and lawyer marketing agency covers assessing a supplier.

For the channels either side of search: law firm digital marketing covers what to measure once the work starts, and law firm local seo covers the map results, which are decided on different factors.

If the firm is small enough that the scope has to pay for itself quickly: small law firm seo.

Frequently asked questions