Law firm SEO, and the search advantage UK firms already hold
English and Welsh firms are already required to publish price and service information. Those disclosures answer the exact questions people search for, which means the compulsory work and the ranking work are the same work. Almost no firm writes them that way.
Last updated: 4 August 2026
Why are the transparency rules a search advantage?
Because the rule asks a firm to answer the questions its clients most want answered, and answering them well is also how a page ranks.
The SRA Transparency Rules have been in force since 6 December 2018 and require price and service information for specified work types. Consider what that actually means as a set of documents: what the work costs, what the disbursements are, how long it takes, who does it and what their qualifications are.
Now consider what people search: how much does a conveyancing solicitor cost, how long does probate take, what are the fees for an immigration application.
They are the same questions. A firm doing the disclosure properly has written the highest-intent pages on its site as a by-product.
The evidence that almost nobody does: of the 40 legal-marketing suppliers we read on 3 August 2026 — the people selling to these firms — 12 published a price and 5 of those only a range. The habit of not answering runs through the whole market.
What does a firm actually have to build?
Fewer pages than an agency will propose, and specific ones.
| Page | How many | Why it ranks |
|---|---|---|
| One per specified work type, with price | One per work type | The disclosure and the search are identical |
| One per practice area you want more of | Two or three, realistically | The commercial searches |
| One per fee earner, with qualifications | One each | The rule asks for it; clients read it |
| Complaints information | One | Expected, and rarely present |
| One per office | One each | Only where the firm actually operates |
A two-work-type firm with three fee earners is looking at eleven or twelve pages. A supplier proposing sixty is selling volume, and volume without search intent behind it is how a site fills with pages nobody looks for.
A damaging admission: month one produces nothing measurable. The crawl, the page map and the drafting all happen before any position moves, and no supplier can compress that.
What does it cost, here and elsewhere?
Ours is published. Most are not.
| Product | Price |
|---|---|
| Price Transparency Pack | £890, ten working days |
| Firm Site | £2,400 |
| Firm Site+ | £4,200 |
| Authority Build | £6,900 |
| Retainer, monthly | £600 · £1,200 · £2,400, no minimum term |
£700 comes off the build when taken with six months of retainer.
For context on what the traffic is worth: London immigration runs 2,900 searches a month at around £18.75 a click, and Manchester conveyancing 1,760 at £18.57, measured 3 August 2026. A hundred Manchester clicks is roughly £1,857 — which makes the Price Transparency Pack cheaper than buying half a year of the search it helps you rank for.
Which of these names are actually agencies?
Two of the four below are not, and that matters when a shortlist is assembled from a search result.
| Name | What it is | Published a price |
|---|---|---|
| jmw.co.uk | A law firm | Yes |
| lexisnexis.co.uk | Legal publisher | Yes |
| uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com | Legal publisher | No |
| tealcompliance.com | Compliance consultancy | Yes |
None of the four is a marketing agency. They rank on these searches because they publish substantial material about running a firm — which is itself the lesson of this page. Publishing the answer is what ranks, whoever you are.
⚠ We record whether a price appeared on the page, not what it was. The figures our tooling collected mixed genuine fees with case values and fragments, so attributing a number to a named business would publish something unverified.
What must a proposal contain before you sign it?
Six items. A proposal missing more than two is not comparable with one that has them all.
- The price, as a figure rather than a range.
- The minimum term, if any. One supplier in forty offers none.
- Which pages get built, by name and count.
- Who writes the price information, and whether a fee earner approves it before publication.
- Who owns the site and the content if the relationship ends.
- What the supplier will not do.
Item four is specific to this jurisdiction. The published price information is a statement by the firm, not by its marketing supplier, and it should be approved by somebody who can stand behind it.
We build the pages the rules ask for. We do not judge whether a firm complies — that judgement belongs to the firm and its COLP, and a supplier claiming otherwise is offering something it cannot give.
Where is another supplier the better choice?
Two situations.
When instructions are needed this quarter. Nothing here works in under three months. We do not manage ad spend, and a paid specialist is the correct answer.
When the firm wants the price information drafted by somebody who can advise on the rule itself. We write pages; a compliance consultancy advises on obligations. Those are different services and a firm unsure of its position should take the second before the first.
Before you shortlist anyone
We read 40 legal-marketing suppliers in full in August 2026 — including several on this page. Twelve published a price. One offered work with no minimum term.
The free report gives you the full count, named, so you can repeat it rather than take ours. It also shows how many people search for your practice areas in your town, and what those clicks cost to buy at Google's own prices.
Get the report — five questions, about two minutes →
No call required. Our own prices are on that page.
Where should I read next?
If you are choosing between agencies: law firm SEO agency, lawyer marketing agency, legal marketing agency and marketing agency for legal firms each approach the selection from a different angle.
If the site itself is the problem rather than the searches, law firm website design company.
Frequently asked questions
How do the transparency rules help a firm rank?
The disclosures the rules ask for answer the same questions people search: what the work costs, what the disbursements are, how long it takes and who does it. A firm doing the disclosure properly has written its highest-intent pages as a by-product.
How many pages does a UK firm need for SEO?
A firm with two specified work types and three fee earners needs roughly eleven or twelve: one priced page per work type, two or three practice-area pages, one per fee earner, complaints information, and one per office. A supplier proposing sixty is selling volume.
How much does law firm SEO cost in the UK?
Our retainers are £600, £1,200 or £2,400 a month with no minimum term, the build is £2,400, and the Price Transparency Pack is £890 over ten working days. Of 40 suppliers read on 3 August 2026, twelve published any price and one offered no minimum term.
Is the Price Transparency Pack worth it against buying the traffic?
A hundred Manchester conveyancing clicks costs roughly £1,857 at £18.57 each, measured 3 August 2026. The £890 pack is less than half of that, and the pages remain after the money is spent rather than stopping when it is.
Who should write the published price information?
The firm, with a fee earner approving it before publication. It is a statement by the firm rather than by its marketing supplier, and any proposal should say explicitly who drafts it and who signs it off.
Can a supplier make my firm compliant?
No. That judgement belongs to the firm and its COLP. A supplier can build the pages the rules ask for and state factually which items are missing from a site, which is a different thing from certifying compliance.
When should I use a compliance consultancy instead?
When the firm is unsure of its own position under the rules. We write pages; advising on the obligation itself is a different service, and a firm that needs the second should take it before commissioning the first.